How is a performance architect different from a normal architect?

How is a performance architect different from a normal architect?

At CR-BPS, we understand that there are many definitions and variations related to architecture that will determine what makes us a good fit for various projects. Our expertise in performance architecture has given us opportunities to partner with homeowners to build energy efficient homes and to partner with municipalities to manage their facilities and manage their operational restorations. But the exact type of architect that’s best for a given project depends entirely on the work that’s needed. If you’re in the market for an architectural partner, it’s important that you know what you‘re looking for and what you need. And while there aren’t necessarily clear lines between types of architects and while there’s not technical definition of “normal” or “traditional” in architecture, it’s still important that you focus on the expertise and specializations of the architectural partners you’re enlisting. A performance architect differs from a “traditional” architect primarily in focus and approach. Here are some key distinctions:  

Focus on Performance Metrics:

  • Performance Architect: Emphasizes measurable performance outcomes, such as energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, and sustainability metrics. 
  • Traditional Architect: May focus more on aesthetics, form, and functionality without as strong an emphasis on performance metrics. 

Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Performance Architect: Often collaborates closely with engineers, building scientists, and sustainability experts to integrate various systems and technologies for optimal performance. 
  • Traditional Architect: While collaboration is still important, the emphasis may be more on design concepts and less on performance integration. 

Sustainability and Resilience:

  • Performance Architect: Prioritizes sustainable practices, resilience to climate change, and resource efficiency throughout the design and construction process. 
  • Traditional Architect: Sustainability may be a consideration but not always a primary focus. 

Technology Utilization: 

  • Performance Architect: Leverages advanced technologies, modeling tools, and simulations to predict and analyze building performance during the design phase. 
  • Traditional Architect: May use technology primarily for design visualization rather than performance analysis. 

Lifecycle Consideration:

  • Performance Architect: Takes a holistic view of a building’s lifecycle, considering long-term maintenance, operational efficiency, and eventual decommissioning. 
  • Traditional Architect: Focus may be more on the initial design and construction phases, with less emphasis on long-term performance. 

User Experience and Engagement:

  • Performance Architecture: Actively seeks to increase building performance and reduce carbon footprint. This involves engaging occupants in the design process to ensure that their needs for comfort and functionality are met while optimizing performance. 
  • Traditional Architect: User engagement is important, but design and performance may (but not always) be treated as siloed services or features, so that optimal performance of a space is not integrated into optimal design.  
In summary, while both types of architects share core design principles, a performance architect places a stronger emphasis on optimizing a building’s performance and sustainability throughout its lifecycle. CR-BPS has been leading in this space since our very start and has partnered with city governments, universities, businesses, and individuals to make sustainable building principles the standard for construction.  

See how CR-BPS can be your partner for building toward a better planet and a better world.

Connect With an Expert
Learn More